Scalability of dark current in silicon PIN photodiode
Feng Ya-Jie1, 2, Li Chong2, Liu Qiao-Li2, Wang Hua-Qiang2, Hu An-Qi1, He Xiao-Ying2, †, Guo Xia1, ‡
School of Electronic Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing Key Laboratory of Work Safety Intelligent Monitoring, Beijing 100876, China
Department of Information, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: xyhe@bjut.edu.cn guox@bupt.edu.cn

Abstract

The mechanism for electrical conduction is investigated by the dark temperature-dependent current–voltage characteristics of Si PIN photodiodes with different photosensitive areas. The characteristic tunneling energy E00 can be obtained to be 1.40 meV, 1.53 meV, 1.74 meV, 1.87 meV, and 2.01 meV, respectively, for the photodiodes with L = 0.25 mm, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2 mm by fitting the ideality factor n versus temperature curves according to the tunneling-enhanced recombination mechanism. The trap-assisted tunneling-enhanced recombination in the i-layer plays an important role in our device, which is consistent with the experimental result that area-dependent leakage current is dominant with the side length larger than 1 mm of the photosensitive area. Our results reveal that the quality of the bulk material plays an important role in the electrical conduction mechanism of the devices with the side length larger than 1 mm of the photosensitive area.

1. Introduction

Silicon PIN photodiodes have wide applications in IR remote controls, industrial electronics, defense, security, medical and scientific instruments, etc. due to their high sensitivity and low cost.[13] The sensitivity of a photodetector determines the lowest light intensity that can be detected, which reflects the image definition.[4] The leakage current directly relates to the sensitivity of the detector, hence, it is important to understand the electrical conduction mechanism inside. It is generally believed that the leakage current is composed of bulk diffusion current, generation–recombination current of minority carriers in the space-charge region,[5,6] tunneling current at the p/i interface, etc.[7] Besides the material quality and electric-field design inside, the perimeter-to-area of the photosensitive region also influences the leakage current of the device.[810] In this paper, the quantitative analyses of the electrical properties of the Si PIN photodiodes with different photosensitive areas are demonstrated by the temperature-dependent current–voltage (IV) measurement method. It is shown that the trap-assisted recombination plays a more important role in the dark carrier transport mechanism with the increase of the device size. The scalability study indicates that the perimeter of the photosensitive region affects the dark current more than their photosensitive area when the side length of the photosensitive region is below 0.5 mm.

2. Experiments

The cross-sectional diagram of the Si PIN photodetector studied in this paper is illustrated in Fig. 1. The guard ring with phosphor ion implantation was used in order to avoid the dark current generated from the wafer-dicing damage. The SiNx was grown by low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) as an antireflection coating layer with a transmittance of 95.5% on the photosensitive surface. The surface regions without implantation were covered by passivating oxide layers. The side lengths (L) of the square photosensitive region were designed to be 0.25 mm, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2 mm, respectively. The temperature-dependent IV curves were measured by using the apparatus consisting of a closed-cycle helium cryostat from the JANIS company, a programmable temperature controller and a Keithley 4200, a source-measure meter in the dark environment.

Fig. 1. (color online) Cross-sectional diagram of Si PIN photodiode. Photosensitive area is covered by SiN antireflection coating layer with transmittance of 95.5%.
3. Results and discussion

Figure 2(a) shows the forward dark IV curves for the photodiodes with L=0.25 mm, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2 mm under the room temperature. The ideality factors are calculated to be 1.055, 1.062, 1.054, 1.047, and 1.056, respectively, according to the following expression[11,12]

All the ideality factor values of these PIN photodetectors are close to 1, which indicates the diffusion current dominants the carrier transport under the room temperature. Figure 2(b) shows the dark reverse IV curves under the room temperature for all the five devices. Generally, for Si photodiodes used in the security inspection, the reverse bias is 0 V due to the high responsitivity, which reaches to 0.65 A/W for the photodiodes used in this paper. The reverse curves each can be devided into three parts as shown in Fig. 2(b). For parts I and III, the experimental data are in good agreement with the mathematical model that describes the diffusion current from the quasi-neutral area and the generation current from the depletion area for the whole curve.[13] For part II, there is a crook on each curve, which is attributed to the contamination in the Ohmic contact interface, revealed by the frequency-dependent capacitance-voltage measurement.[14]

Fig. 2. (color online) Dark IV curves measured under the room temperature for Si photodiodes with L=0.25 mm, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2 mm, respectively. (a) Forward biased. (b) Reverse biased. (c) Dependence of reverse current on the side length of the photosensitive area with reverse bias voltages of −1 V, −10 V, −20 V, and −30 V. The lines are the fitting curves according to Eq. (1).

The reverse dark current can be decomposed into the length-dependent part generated from the edge of p–n junction, the area-dependent part generated in or close to the depletion region, and a compensation current which depends on neither area nor circumference.[15] Thus, the total leakage current with the side length can be expressed as follows:

where IR is the total reverse leakage current of the photodiodes; Jperi is the current density per mm generated at the surface, Jarea is the current density generated in the area; Ioffset is the current offset. Figure 2(c) shows the reverse currents versus side length at −1 V, −10 V, −20 V, and −30 V on the side length L of the photodiodes. The data are extracted from Fig. 2(b) and denoted by dots. The solid curves are the fitting curves with these dots according to Eq. (1), which agree well with the experimental data. The ratio of the length-dependent (Iperi/IR) and area-dependent leakage current (Iarea/IR) can be extracted from the fitting. For the devices with L = 0.25 mm and 0.5 mm at the voltage lower than −10 V, the main leakage comes from the perimeter for the small device at lower bias. While for the devices with L = 1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2 mm, the leakage from the bulk material is the main leakage source. For the device with L = 2 mm at −1 V, the area-dependent leakage current can reach to 81% and increases slowly with bias increasing.

In order to further study the electric conduction behaviors in the Si photodiodes, the temperature-dependent IV curves are measured. Figure 3(a) presents the dark forward IV measurement results from 40 K to 300 K by taking the device with L = 2 mm for example. The slopes of the log IV plots are calculated to be 58.06, 59.52, 57.37, 47.02, 43.74, 43.18, 42.11, 39.61, and 37.68, respectively, which are sensitive to temperature. The values of corresponding ideality factor n are 6.18, 2.67, 1.93, 1.65, 1.33, 1.12, 1.07, 1.05, and 1.02, respectively, which decrease with temperature increasing. The recombination process may occur in the space charge region or at the p–i interface. It can be noted that the slope values of log IV curves at 40 K, 80 K, and 120 K are very close to each other, which indicates that the recombination process is enhanced by tunneling assisted by defects at or close to the junction interface.[16]

Fig. 3. (color online) (a) Temperature-dependent forward IV curves in semi-logarithmic coordinates for photodiode with L = 2 mm from 40 K to 300 K. (b) Variations of ideality factor n with temperature (dots); solid lines represent fitting results according to Eq. (2). Empty circles denote reciprocals of ideality factor; dotted lines refer to fitting results according to Eq. (3).

The tunneling-enhanced recombination assisted by defects or traps in the bulk material or close to the junction interface can be expressed, respectively, as[1721]

where E00 is the characteristic tunneling energy, and T is the characteristic temperature. When the E00 is close to 0 in Eq. (3), the recombination process is of the classical Shockley–Read–Hall recombination.

Figure 3(b) shows the relationships of n versus T and 1/n versus T, and their corresponding fitting results which are denoted by lines. It is found that the experimental data fit very well for the n and T relationship to the theoretical expression of Eq. (2), which describes the tunneling-enhanced interface recombination mechanism for all the devices. For the fitting according to Eq. (3), the experimental data also fit well for all the devices. According to the fitting results of Eq. (3), the values of E00 are 1.40 meV, 1.53 meV, 1.74 meV, 1.87 meV, and 2.01 meV, respectively, for the photodiodes with L = 0.25 mm, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2 mm. The characteristic tunneling energy increases with L increasing, which indicates that the tunneling process becomes easier with length increasing, which is consistent with the conclusion that area-dependent leakage current is dominant with the side length larger than 1 mm of the photosensitive area.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the scalibity of the electrical conduction mechanism has been investigated for the Si PIN photodiode. The forward temperature-dependent IV measurement results demonstrate that trap-assistant recombination can be used to explain the electronic loss mechanism. The quality of the bulk material plays an important role in the electrical conduction mechanism for the devices with the side length larger than 1 mm of the photosensitive area.

Reference
1 Jiang J Xu Z Lin J Liu G L 2016 J. Sensors 2016 1
2 Guo X Liu Q Zhou H Luan X Li C Hu Z Hu A He X 2017 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 39 228
3 Nazififard M Suh K Y Mahmoudieh A 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 073502
4 Bao C Chen Z Fang Y Wei H Deng Y Xiao X Li L Huang J 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1703209
5 Sze S M Ng K K 2006 Physics of Semiconductor Devices 3 John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons 97 10.1002/0470068329
6 Arch J Fonash S 1992 Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 757
7 Hegedus S S Salzman N Fagen E 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 63 5126
8 Murakami Y Satoh Y Furuya H Shingyouji T 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 84 3175
9 Poyai A Simoen E Claeys C Czerwinski A 2000 Mater. Sci. Eng. 73 191
10 Li T Wang Y Li Y F Tang H J Li X Gong H M 2010 J. Optoelectron. Laser 21 500
11 Chen F P Zhang Y M Zhang Y M Tang X Y Wang Y H Chen W H 2011 Chin. Phys. 20 117301
12 Chen F P Zhang Y M Lv H L Zhang Y M Huang J H 2010 Chin. Phys. 19 097107
13 Nadenau V Rau U Jasenek A Schock H W 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 87 584
14 Guo X Feng Y Liu Q Wang H Li C Hu Z He X 2017 IEEE J. Electron Dev. Soc. 5 390
15 Loukianova N V Folkerts H O Maas J P Verbugt D W Mierop A J Hoekstra W Roks E Theuwissen A J 2003 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 50 77
16 Dalapati P Manik N B Basu A N 2014 J. Semicond. 35 082001
17 Dalapati P Manik N B Basu A N 2015 Cryogenic. 65 10
18 Sellai A 2008 ICSE 2008 IEEE International Conference Johor Bahru November 2008, Malaysia 267
19 Pattabi M Krishnan S Sanjeev G 2007 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 91 1521
20 Padovani F Stratton R 1966 Solid-State Electron 9 695
21 Zhong J Yao Y Zheng Y Yang F Ni Y Q He Z Y Shen Z Zhou G L Zhou D Q Wu Z S Zhang B J Liu Y 2015 Chin. Phys. 24 097303